Massachusetts family law lawyer Nicole K. Levy reviews establishing paternity for children of unmarried parents in Massachusetts.
Massachusetts law strives to treat the children of unmarried parents identically with children of married parents. Nevertheless, several important differences exist between divorce and cases involving unmarried parents. First among these differences is the need to formally establish paternity (i.e. the biological identity of a child’s father) in cases involving unmarried parents.
If you are a father who never married your child’s mother, you have both have rights and obligations under Massachusetts law. Prior to determining the legal rights and responsibilities of each unmarried parent, however, a court must establish that an unmarried father is, in fact, a child’s biological father. This process, known as “establishing paternity”, can be done by a written agreement between parents or by a court of competent jurisdiction. Once paternity is established, the court has the authority to order child support, order one parent to provide health insurance, or make orders relative to custody and parenting time.
Table of Contents for this Blog
- How to Establish Paternity without a Court Order
- Does the Father’s Name Appear on the Birth Certificate Already?
- What about Mistaken Identity?
- About Last Names: an Unmarried Mother’s Choice
- Going to Court to Establish Paternity
- Married Parents: When the Husband is Not the Father
- Determining Paternity: to Test or not to Test?
- Complaints for Custody, Visitation and Support Pursuant to Chapter 209C
If you and your child’s other parent are not married, but both recognize the father’s paternity, a Voluntary Acknowledgment of Parentage form can be executed that avoids court involvement in determining paternity. This document establishes the legal rights and responsibilities of a biological father, as well as the mother, inasmuch as a mother’s rights are closely tied to those of a father. As discussed below, the execution of a Voluntary Acknowledgment of Parentage is an extremely serious decision. Massachusetts law only allows a parent 60 days to demand a paternity (DNA) test after an acknowledgment has been executed. (If there is a custody or child support hearing less than 60 days from the acknowledgment, then a party only has until the date of the hearing to rescind the acknowledgment or demand a DNA test.)
After 60 days, a party’s ability to rescind an acknowledgment of paternity narrows to only those cases in which the party can prove that he or she signed the acknowledgement as a result of fraud, duress or material mistake of fact. After one year, even these grounds for rescission become unavailable. Indeed, it cannot emphasized enough: once a year has expired, even definitive proof – for example, a DNA test proving another man is the child’s father – generally will not change the binding effect that a Voluntary Acknowledgment of Parentage has on both of the named parents. A named father who tries to escape child support after one year will generally fail, even if another man can be proven as the biological parent of a child. Likewise, a mother trying to end the named father’s custody or parenting time on the grounds that another man is the child’s true biological father will generally fail.
Most Massachusetts hospitals require unmarried parents to execute a Voluntary Acknowledgment of Parentage when a child is born in order to place both parents’ names on the child’s birth certificate. Although there can be unusual exceptions, if a father’s name appears on a child’s birth certificate, it generally means that a Voluntary Acknowledgment of Parentage has already been executed. Even if the Voluntary Acknowledgment of Parentage was not executed at the hospital, a signed acknowledgement must generally be on file at the town/city hall where the child was born or the state department of vital records in order for an unmarried father’s name to appear on a child’s birth certificate. (It is worth noting that parents often do not remember executing a Voluntary Acknowledgment of Parentage at the hospital, due to the excitement and exhaustion of the birth process, as well as the sheer volume of documents that must be signed in connection with the mother and child’s medical care.)
As noted above, timing is critical for cases of mistaken identity. If parties have already executed a Voluntary Acknowledgement of Paternity, but subsequently learn there may be a different father, parties can seek change the Acknowledgement through the court within a limited periods of time described above. The party must file a Complaint to Establish Paternity (naming the alternate father) with the court, as well as a motion specifically addressing the incorrectly named father. Time is of the essence. If parties exceed 60 days, it becomes much more difficult to change the paternity designation. If more than one year passes, the judgment establishing paternity will be considered final and close to impossible to change.
At this point, it should be noted that an unmarried mother has the right to determine a child’s last name. Occasionally, father’s mistakenly believe that establishing paternity after a child is born means that the child will adopt the father’s last name. This is not the case. Even if the father’s name appears on the child’s birth certificate, choosing the child’s last name is the exclusive right of an unmarried mother. Only in rare and unusual cases would a court consider changing a child’s last name to match the unmarried father’s last name over a mother’s objection following the child’s birth.
If a Voluntary Acknowledgement of Paternity has not been signed, parties seeking to establish parenting time or child support must file a Complaint to Establish Paternity with the Court. No one is obligated to execute an acknowledgment of paternity (hence the use of the word “voluntary”), and it may be that either parent refuses to sign due to (a.) a sincere disagreement over the child’s parentage or (b.) discomfort with the rights and obligations arising out of parentage. Regardless, without agreement on parentage, then the it is necessary to have the court intervene.
There are many reasons for a parent to want to establish paternity, including basic rights and responsibilities such as child support and parenting time. Additionally, the court does not limit those who can file to establish paternity to just the mother and the father; a child can file, a grandparent can file, and a personal representative or guardian for a child or parent can file. Indeed, if the Commonwealth of Massachusetts has an interest in the welfare and wellbeing of the child, the state can file an action to establish paternity through the Department of Revenue (DOR) or the Department of Children and Families (DCF). For example, if a mother is receiving welfare in Massachusetts, it is not uncommon for the state to file a complaint to establish paternity in an effort to recoup the costs of welfare through child support.
If a child is born during a marriage, or within 300 days after the marriage ended, Massachusetts law presumes that the husband is the biological father of the child. In these situations, a biological father (i.e. a father other than the husband) may be barred from filing to establish his paternity.
In such cases, the married parties must generally execute an Affidavit stating that the husband is not the child’s biological father. The husband becomes involved in the court process if he refuses to admit that the child is not biologically his. It should be noted that the biological father’s name will generally not be allowed on the birth certificate unless the Affidavit is signed by the husband, or, if he refuses to sign, until the court has established paternity. Cases of this nature are often complicated, and having qualified legal counsel is generally a good idea.
Paternity can be established with our without genetic marker testing. Unsurprisingly, a putative father cannot avoid being declared a child’s father by refusing to participate in testing. Absent a strong and persuasive reason for avoiding the test, a putative father’s refusal to submit to testing will generally be considered evidence of paternity.
Genetic Marker Testing
Most Massachusetts courts will use a “genetic marker test” to determine the father of a child. All parties ordered to participate must do so, which usually include the mother, the father, and the child. The test can be performed via a blood test or check swab. The court will consider the results if a party requests the test and demonstrates why a particular person should be tested. One cannot merely walk into court and request that the judge order a genetic marker test on a random individual; the party seeking the test must explain under oath why a person or child should be subject to a test. Generally, alleging intercourse with the other party during the time frame of conception is sufficient to convince a judge that a test should be performed.
Other Ways to Determine Paternity
A judge can also decide who the father is without paternity tests; for example, when the putative father cannot be located or cannot or will not participate in testing. A judge will consider any and all relevant information in making this determination, including affidavits and sworn testimony if the other parent fails to appear or submit to testing.
In closing, it should be noted that over the last decade, many states began avoiding “paternity” and “children born out of wedlock” as words to describe every case involving the children of unmarried parents. Historically, children born out of wedlock have suffered from negative stereotypes. In Massachusetts, unmarried parents seeking to establish or enforce custody or child support – in cases where parentage has been established – can file what is known as a Complaint to Establish Custody-Support-Parenting Time. Such complaints are largely identical to Complaints to Establish Paternity, but use updated terminology (including the use of “parenting time” over the increasingly antiquated term, “visitation”) to describe the parents and children involved.
About the Author: Nicole K. Levy is a Massachusetts family law lawyer and Massachusetts divorce attorney for Lynch & Owens, located in Hingham, Massachusetts.
Disclaimer: The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. You are invited to contact our office. Contacting the office does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to the office until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established. This blog is considered an advertisement for The Law Office of Lynch & Owens, P.C. The Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct broadly govern all advertisements and communications made by attorneys and law firms in the Commonwealth. Generally, legal websites and any other content published on the internet by lawyers are considered a type of communication and an advertisement, according to the Comments to Rule 7.2.