Massachusetts divorce lawyer Jason V. Owens examines a recent case that defined the “length of a marriage” in Massachusetts differently for alimony and asset division purposes.
AUGUST 5, 2015 – This morning the Massachusetts Appeals Court entered another decision interpreting the Alimony Reform Act of Massachusetts. The case, Valaskatgis v. Valaskatgis, examined whether definition for “the length of the marriage” under the alimony act – which is defined as the period from the date of the marriage to the date of service of the Complaint for Divorce – should also apply to the division of marital assets.
If the Court adopted the definition from the alimony statute, it would mean that property acquired by either party after service of the Complaint for Divorce – i.e. any property obtained during the divorce case – could be excluded from the final division of assets. The Court rejected this interpretation, however.
The Court held that “[[n]othing in the language of … the language of the Alimony Reform Act … indicates or suggests that its definitions are to be exported beyond” the realm of alimony. Accordingly, property acquired by spouses during the divorce remains subject to division.
Think you have an alimony case in Massachusetts? Estimate the amount and duration of alimony in your case with the Lynch & Owens Massachusetts Alimony Calculator:
About the Author: Jason V. Owens is a Massachusetts divorce lawyer and Massachusetts family law attorney for Lynch & Owens, located in Hingham, Massachusetts.
Disclaimer: The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. You are invited to contact our office. Contacting the office does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to the office until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established. This blog is considered an advertisement for The Law Office of Lynch & Owens, P.C. The Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct broadly govern all advertisements and communications made by attorneys and law firms in the Commonwealth. Generally, legal websites and any other content published on the internet by lawyers are considered a type of communication and an advertisement, according to the Comments to Rule 7.2.